JuliaDebug / JuliaDebug/Debugger.jl
Some regressions in function printing on 1.5
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 514
- Forks
- 50
- Avg merge
- 9d 9h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
From https://github.com/JuliaDebug/Debugger.jl/pull/263
- |About to run: (inner_kw)(1, 2; c=5)
+ |About to run: (var"#inner_kw##kw"())((c = 5,), inner_kw, 1, 2)
-In inner_kw(a, b; c, d) at ui.jl:56
+|In #inner_kw#10(c, d, , a, b) at ui.jl:55
-|About to run: (g_invoke)(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
+|About to run: (Core._apply_iterate)(iterate, g_invoke, (1, 2), (3,), [4, 5])
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing PR #263 and comparing the three function-printing regressions shown in this issue. Trace the debugger's output for keyword functions, lowered keyword wrappers, and splatted calls; done means the displayed calls and function names remain readable rather than exposing internal Julia representations.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- devtools
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100