JuliaData / JuliaData/DataFramesMeta.jl
Re-name `@with`
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 496
- Forks
- 56
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
StaticModules.jl has a macro @with defined, and Infiltrator.jl is (maybe) defining a @with.
Ultimately @with just seems like too general a name for a macro that is so data-frames specific. It's also hard to imagine a With.jl package we could base this on because @with creates an anonymous function whereas a type-stable object can get by with just a let block.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the @with macro definition in StaticModules.jl and the issue discussion about the possible conflict with Infiltrator.jl. Compare the proposed naming direction, including the distinction from a hypothetical With.jl package; done means the project has agreed on a less-general macro name and completed the corresponding rename.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100