JuliaCollections / JuliaCollections/AbstractTrees.jl

`filter` and/or `filter!`

Open
#87 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Julia
Stars
243
Forks
67
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Would it make sense for this package to define filter and/or filter!?

I've looked into the implementation and guess that this issue boils down to: Is there a kind of null element defined for abstract trees? If yes, then a PreOrderDFS could replace elements by null and that should work, I think.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the package's tree interfaces and the PreOrderDFS implementation, focusing on whether abstract trees define a null element. Determine the intended semantics and API for filter and filter!, then confirm the scope and acceptance criteria before attempting implementation.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
julia
Domain
data
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.