JuliaCollections / JuliaCollections/AbstractTrees.jl
Don't assume stored children
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 243
- Forks
- 67
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
There's a trait for ParentLinks and SiblingLinks, it would be great if there was a ChildrenLinks trait too. Of course, a tree needs at least one of {link to children, link to parent}.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the definitions and uses of ParentLinks and SiblingLinks, then inspect how tree traversal currently represents children. Done means a ChildrenLinks trait is specified and integrated consistently with the stated parent/children relationship, with matching coverage where the existing traits are tested.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100