JuliaCollections / JuliaCollections/AbstractTrees.jl
Array/vector comprehension and AbstractTrees Leaves iterator
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 243
- Forks
- 67
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Why the array comprehension behaves differently with the AbstractTrees.Leaves iterator?
In the following replacing Leaves(t) with, say, range(1,3,3), I do get the 2D array.
julia> using AbstractTrees
julia> t = [[1, 2], 3]
2-element Vector{Any}:
[1, 2]
3
julia> [(i,j) for i in Leaves(t), j in Leaves(t) ]
9-element Vector{Tuple{Int64, Int64}}:
(1, 1)
(2, 1)
(3, 1)
(1, 2)
(2, 2)
(3, 2)
(1, 3)
(2, 3)
(3, 3)
julia> [(i,j) for i in collect(Leaves(t)), j in collect(Leaves(t)) ]
3×3 Matrix{Tuple{Int64, Int64}}:
(1, 1) (1, 2) (1, 3)
(2, 1) (2, 2) (2, 3)
(3, 1) (3, 2) (3, 3)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the shown Julia REPL examples with AbstractTrees.Leaves(t), collect(Leaves(t)), and range(1,3,3). Compare the iterator behavior with Julia's array-comprehension rules; done means establishing whether Leaves is incorrect or the behavior needs documentation, with a focused regression test or explanation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 32/100