JuliaClimate / JuliaClimate/meta
Focus of the organization: Subjects, packages, notebooks, etc
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 7
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hello and welcome!
As a 1st discussion, I propose we list potentiel repos that could be included into JuliaClimate organization.
This will probably leads to a discussion about the focus of the organization. I'd say that anything close to Climate data, climate models and climate analysis could be potential candidates.
What do you think?
Cheers!
edit - Pinging people in the org that are not watching the meta repo (not sure they receive notifications, might be a good idea to "Watch" the repos in the future?) @Datseris @Alexander-Barth @visr @ali-ramadhan @aramirezreyes @glwagner @hdrake @milankl @natgeo-wong @navidcy @simonbyrne
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file, test, or entry point is named in this organizational discussion. Read the existing 34-comment thread and define the organization’s scope and any candidate-repository list before identifying a concrete, reviewable change; completion is not specified by the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100