JuliaCI / JuliaCI/CoverageTools.jl
Functions are very noisy
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 9
- Forks
- 7
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
There are a lot of @info in the package. Although it is sometimes practical to watch, it would be great if it would be a controllable feature.
What do you think of passing a verbose kwarg? I could make a PR
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Search the package for its @info calls and review the surrounding function APIs before deciding whether a verbose keyword can be applied consistently. Check the existing test coverage for these functions; done should mean callers can control the noisy output without changing normal results.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100