Multi-threading loops ignored
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 182
- Forks
- 67
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Multi-threading loops are ignored in counting and each such a loop leads to one missed count. So, the final coverage figures are always lower than the true ones. I wonder if is any way to avoid this.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the missed-count behavior for a multi-threaded loop in Coverage.jl and trace how coverage counts are collected. Done means multi-threaded loops are included in the final coverage figures without reducing the true count.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- testing
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100