JuliaCI / JuliaCI/BenchmarkTools.jl
common histogram bounds when displaying multiple benchmarks
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 684
- Forks
- 107
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
@timholy just implemented manual histogram bounds in https://github.com/JuliaCI/BenchmarkTools.jl/pull/255, but it occurred to me that when you display multiple benchmarks together (in an array, for example), then it would be even nicer to figure out common histogram bounds for all the benchmarks.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading PR #255, which introduced manual histogram bounds, then trace how multiple benchmarks are displayed together, such as in an array. Define how the shared bounds should be chosen across those benchmarks and verify that the resulting histograms use common bounds when displayed together.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 32/100