JuliaAI / JuliaAI/ScientificTypesBase.jl
Maybe promote_typejoin is better than in implementation of scitype_union
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 10
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading CategoricalArrays.jl's src/array.jl at line 236, the only implementation reference provided. Compare that behavior with ScientificTypesBase.jl's scitype_union implementation and identify the intended type-joining semantics; the issue names no local test or explicit completion condition.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100