JuliaAI / JuliaAI/MLJModelInterface.jl

It seems some macros in metadata_utils cause issues if an MLJ interface is wrapped in module

Open
#89 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Julia
Stars
39
Forks
8
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/MLJ.jl/issues/744#issuecomment-786746319

See also this comment: "A quirk of submodules and evaluation scopes makes it necessary to load this submodule in the package init function" from #20

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the macros in metadata_utils and the package init function, then read the linked MLJ.jl comment and the comment from #20 about submodules and evaluation scopes. Reproduce the failure with an MLJ interface wrapped in a module; done means the metadata macros work correctly in that wrapped setup.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
julia
Domain
machine-learning
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.