JuliaAI / JuliaAI/MLJModelInterface.jl

Do we really need a `training_losses` fallback?

Open
#153 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Julia
Stars
39
Forks
8
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

We already have supports_training_losses. It also seems that documentation does not require the fallback, but this should be checked.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Search the package for training_losses and supports_training_losses, then inspect the documentation to determine whether the fallback is required. Done means the fallback's necessity is established and the resulting change or decision is clearly recorded.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
julia
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Refactor
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
28/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.