JuliaAI / JuliaAI/MLJLinearModels.jl
Hardcoding of `Float64` in loss
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 86
- Forks
- 15
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Is there a motivation for hardcoding the scaling in the loss penalties as Float64? If not, would a more generic definition allow for multiple types of regression outputs (Float64, 32, 16)?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start at src/loss-penalty/generic.jl line 21 and trace how the Float64 scaling is used by the loss penalties. Determine whether the definition can support Float16, Float32, and Float64 regression outputs without breaking existing behavior. Done means the motivation is established and the genericity question is resolved in the implementation or issue discussion.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100