Jordan-Hall / Jordan-Hall/browser
[P1][RES-01] Deep retrieval and exact-link discovery
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Programme: #1
Epic: #25
## Objective
Build a research retrieval pipeline that optimizes for useful exact sources and primary evidence rather than a traditional ranked page of links.
## Scope
- Query decomposition from GoalContract constraints.
- Source planning across installed connectors, public web, domain APIs and user-authorized sources.
- Canonical URL/object resolution and exact-link validation.
- Retrieval logs including query/source/time/result disposition.
- Primary-source preference and independent-source grouping.
- Record inaccessible/failed sources as explicit evidence gaps.
- Product/entity identifier extraction for downstream entity resolution.
- Cache only within source-specific access/retention rules.
## Research rules
- Search snippets are discovery hints, not sufficient evidence for material facts.
- Ten syndicated copies of one story count as one underlying information source where detected.
- Retrieval breadth does not override privacy/account permissions.
## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] Material results include accessible canonical source links/object IDs where available.
- [ ] Important facts are grounded in underlying evidence, not snippets alone.
- [ ] Primary sources are preferred/explained when available.
- [ ] Inaccessible sources remain explicit gaps rather than hallucinated contents.
- [ ] Duplicate/syndicated source groups are tracked.
- [ ] Research fixture scores exact-link validity, constraint coverage, source quality and missing-source honesty.
## Dependencies
- CONN-01
- DATA-01
**First phase:** P1
**Maturity target:** P2
**Owner:** connectors-domains
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reading the CONN-01 and DATA-01 dependencies, then map the requested retrieval pipeline to query decomposition, source planning, URL/object resolution, logging, and evidence-gap handling. Use the research fixture to check exact-link validity, constraint coverage, source quality, missing-source honesty, and duplicate-source grouping. Done means the listed acceptance criteria are demonstrably satisfied.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- data, search
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100