Clarification for "anonymized" submissions
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Currently, https://www.jmlr.org/tmlr/editorial-policies.html mentions "The manuscript is submitted to OpenReview in anonymized form" and https://www.jmlr.org/tmlr/author-guide.html mentions "submissions must be anonymized", while both of them do not explicitly mention what "anonymized" means.
I assume here "anonymized" means something like "removing identifying information from what you submit on OpenReview"? It would be beneficial to clarify this somewhere. It would also be beneficial to mention something like "You should not try to subvert the double blind review policy by actively revealing your identities to advisory board members and (possible) editors and reviewers of your paper".
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the anonymization statements in editorial-policies.html and author-guide.html, following the OpenReview link for context. Clarify what authors should remove or avoid revealing during double-blind review, and ensure both pages explain the policy consistently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- html
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100