前端微服务化方案对比路由懒加载 vs 子应用模式 - Phodal | Phodal - A Growth Engineer
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 26
- Forks
- 2
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
## 前端微服务化方案对比：路由懒加载 vs 子应用模式 - Phodal | Phodal - A Growth Engineer
前端微服务化方案对比：路由懒加载 vs 子应用模式 Posted by:Phodal Huang March 25, 2018, 11:14 a.m. 撸了个新框架 Mooa，用于前端应用的微服务化拆分。 过去的几周里，作为一个 “专业”…
March 25, 2018 at 07:55PM
via Instapaper https://www.phodal.com/blog/microservices-frontend-compare-route-lazyload-vs-child-application-mode/?PageSpeed=noscript
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
The issue body points to the external article at https://www.phodal.com/blog/microservices-frontend-compare-route-lazyload-vs-child-application-mode/?PageSpeed=noscript. No repository files, tests, entry point, requested change, or completion criteria are provided, so there is no concrete implementation path or definition of done.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100