Define license for contributions of content
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 64
- Forks
- 8
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
We should have a clear license for the content produced by users and stored in CloudRef. StackOverflow uses cc by-sa 3.0: "user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required.
I would use unlicense.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points to inspect. Start by resolving the proposed license choice for user-produced content stored in CloudRef; done means the project has a clear, agreed license for that content.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100