IntersectMBO / IntersectMBO/ouroboros-consensus
`ChainDBLedgerInterface` could probably use a `LedgerDB` instead
Open
good first issue
UTxO-HD
- Dominant language
- Haskell
- Stars
- 67
- Forks
- 43
- Avg merge
- 5d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 43
Description
As noted by Alex [here](https://github.com/IntersectMBO/ouroboros-consensus/pull/1267#discussion_r1837287067) the ChainDBLedgerInterface probably does not need a full ChainDB, but just a LedgerDB would be enough, and we move forward in decoupling components.
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reading the ChainDBLedgerInterface and the discussion linked in the issue, then trace how it currently receives or uses ChainDB. Determine the LedgerDB boundary needed for the interface and update the affected integration points so it no longer depends on a full ChainDB. Done means the components are decoupled without changing their intended ledger behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- haskell
- Domain
- blockchain
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100