IntersectMBO / IntersectMBO/formal-ledger-specifications

Naming conventions for state-like record constructors

Open
#782 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Agda
Stars
52
Forks
20
Avg merge
6d 14h
Merged PRs (30d)
7

Description

There seems to be no convention on the naming of record constructors for state-like record types. This make it hard to mentally navigate some of the rules.

We currently have:

```agda
⟦_,_,_,_,_⟧ᵉ' for EpochState
⟦_,_,_,_⟧ᵘ for UTxOState
⟦_,_,_⟧ᵈ for DState
⟦_,_,_⟧ˡ for LState
```

(There are probably more)

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.