IntersectMBO / IntersectMBO/formal-ledger-specifications
[Dijkstra] Add premise about "dom txrdmrs" to UTXOW rule
Open
era: dijkstra
nested transactions
- Dominant language
- Agda
- Stars
- 52
- Forks
- 20
- Avg merge
- 6d 14h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Description
In figure 13, the Alonzo spec has a premise about the domain of `txrdmrs` missing in the agda spec.
This should be added to the Dijkstra spec. It has been implemented for Conway in #1042.
Contributor guide
Research direction
Compare figure 13 of the Alonzo specification with the Dijkstra UTXOW rule, then review the Conway implementation referenced in issue #1042. Done means the Dijkstra specification includes the missing premise about the domain of txrdmrs and matches the Alonzo rule.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- blockchain
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100