InternLM / InternLM/InternLM-Math
Is the proof included in the Lean-workbook ensured to be correct?
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 550
- Forks
- 39
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I used the header you provided and integrated the formal_statement and proof. Only to find that some cases pass lean server and some don't.
For example:
theorem lean_workbook_26 (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 < x) : x - 1 ≥ Real.log x := by
nlinarith [log_le_sub_one_of_pos hx]
will display error:unknown identifier 'log_le_sub_one_of_pos'
Do you know how to fix it?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reproducing the lean_workbook_26 theorem in the Lean server using the provided header, then check why log_le_sub_one_of_pos is unavailable. Confirm the required environment or declaration and verify that the example compiles without the unknown-identifier error.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100