[aw] Detection Runs
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Newbie friendliness
- 10/100
Research direction
This is an automatically managed tracking issue for threat-detection warnings or failures in GitHub Agentic Workflows. No source file, test, or code change is identified; the issue explicitly says not to assign an agent or close it manually. Done means monitoring the workflow-run comments rather than making a contribution.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
This issue tracks all runs where threat detection flagged problems in agentic workflows in this repository. Each workflow run that completes with a detection warning or failure posts a comment here.
What is a Detection Problem?
A detection problem occurs when the threat detection system either:
- Detects potential security threats (prompt injection, secret leak, malicious patch)
- Fails to produce results (agent failure, parse error)
When continue-on-error: true (the default), these problems produce warnings and safe outputs still proceed. When continue-on-error: false, they block safe outputs entirely.
How This Helps
This issue helps you:
- Track workflows where threat detection raised concerns
- Review patterns of detection warnings or failures
- Identify false positives or recurring issues with threat detection
- Monitor the health of the threat detection system
Resources
[!TIP]
To configure threat detection behavior, update the frontmatter:safe-outputs: threat-detection: continue-on-error: true # Warnings only (default) # continue-on-error: false # Strict mode — block safe outputs
This issue is automatically managed by GitHub Agentic Workflows. Do not close this issue manually.
No action to take - Do not assign to an agent.
- expires on Oct 19, 2026, 5:41 AM UTC
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 8
- Avg merge
- 7h 37m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 56
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web#1388 · 1 comment ·
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web#1385 · 1 comment ·
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 28/100
IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web#1384 · 1 comment ·
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web#1383 · 1 comment ·
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web#1382 ·
All issues in IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web
Similar issues
-
kind/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
kubernetes-sigs/prow#953 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
automated-analysis bug memory-safety
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
area/entangle bug
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
-
kind/bug Ubuntu 24
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
kubernetes-sigs/kubespray#13532 ·