Immediate-Mode-UI / Immediate-Mode-UI/Nuklear
Please add info regarding how the choice of a backend alters the license.
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 11.4k
- Forks
- 686
- Avg merge
- 4d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
I initially came here, because Nuklear was said to be public domain. However, then I noticed that /demo/ shows a multitude of different backends in use, most of which seemed to have some other license than public domain.
Could you please clarify, how using some backend alters the software from being public domain. It would also be nice to know, what backend one should use, if one wishes to retain software in "public domain".
Contributor guide
Research direction
Read the backend examples under /demo/ and compare the licenses they use with Nuklear's public-domain claim. Document how selecting each backend affects distribution and identify which choice preserves the stated goal; completion is clear guidance in the project's documentation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- c
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100