External annotation, commenting or reviewing of resources and metadata
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 1.1k
- Forks
- 564
- Avg merge
- 2d 2h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 29
Description
I just noticed the following desired characteristics in the COAR Community Framework for Good Practices in Repositories (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829); cf.:
5.3 The repository supports external annotation, commenting or reviewing of resources and metadata.
I guess the Guestbook feature already supports some of these desirables. Would it be useful to support more general external feedback, annotation, commenting or reviewing of datasets and files in Dataverse? If so, could this be done with a (tighter) integration of tools like hypothes.is (https://web.hypothes.is/)?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by reviewing the COAR requirement, the Dataverse Guestbook feature, and hypothes.is integration options; done would require an agreed scope and acceptance criteria for external feedback before implementation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100