INCATools / INCATools/ubergraph

QC of new Ubergraph builds

Open
#33 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Makefile
Stars
53
Forks
6
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

What kind of QC should we have in the Ubergraph build? Right now there is very little. If the build completes, and the database is about the expected size, I deploy it. I save the previous database file so that we can easily roll back if a problem is noted.

I can imagine adding some queries that are run against the new build and against the live endpoint, checking that counts haven't decreased.

@dosumis @matentzn any ideas?

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by reviewing how Ubergraph builds and deploys its database and how the live endpoint is checked; done means having agreed QC checks that compare the new build with the live database and define when deployment is safe.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
build-system, data, testing-qa
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.