A few ontologies have stray dc:descriptions

In general, most ontologies in UberGraph do a good job of consistently using [IAO:0000115](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115) for descriptions, and only using `dc:description` when describing Dublin Core terms. However, there are a few ontology terms that have descriptions as `dc:descriptions` can be seen in this Yasgui query: https://api.triplydb.com/s/oM5JcPsby

- [obo:aism/aism-base.owl](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/aism/aism-base.owl)
- [obo:COLAO_0000084](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/COLAO_0000084)
- [obo:UBERON_0003079](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0003079)
- [obo:UBERON_2005228](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_2005228)
- [obo:HP_0020176](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0020176)
- [obo:HP_0025632](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0025632)
- [obo:HP_0032569](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0032569)
- [obo:HP_0033744](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0033744)
- [obo:HP_0033745](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0033745)

These should probably be sent to their respective ontologies for fixing.

Start with the linked Yasgui query and compare its results with the listed ontology terms. Review the source links for aism, COLAO, UBERON, and HP, then determine how each issue should be reported to its respective ontology. Done means the stray dc:description entries are addressed and no longer appear in the query.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.