INCATools / INCATools/dead_simple_owl_design_patterns
Request: related pattern field
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 49
- Forks
- 5
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Simple field we can use to document alternative patterns to the one presented, see [here](https://github.com/obophenotype/upheno/pull/593#issuecomment-588202832). This will help people finding the correct pattern in case its difficult to make a choice.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the linked upheno pull request comment and inspect how this repository represents OWL class design patterns and their fields. Add a field for documenting alternative patterns, with a way to identify the related pattern, and verify that existing patterns remain valid.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100