IHE / IHE/DEV.SDPi

ASCIIDoc content required not clear for core model element descriptions

Open
#336 1 comment 0 reactions 2 assignees View on GitHub

@PaulMartinsen is already working on this.

Since Dec 6, 2024.

Comment Review
Dominant language
Kotlin
Stars
17
Forks
4
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Section Number

"Table 1:A.4.1-1. SDPi Requirement - Core Model Element Descriptions" and "Table 1:A.4.2-1. SDPi Requirement - Core Model Element Descriptions"

Priority

  • Low: Typo or other minor classification that an editor can manage. Requires no group discussion.

Issue

Several terms and attributes appear in both tables with different attributes for the ASCIIDoc. For example a use case is both a core model element (sdpi_requirement_use_case) and a requirement type (sdpi_req_type=use_case_feature). It is not clear what the ASCIIDoc context should be. Other model elements affected include: sdpi_requirement_use_case, sdpi_requirement_ref_standard, sdpi_requirement_ses, sdpi_requirement_tech_feature.

Proposed Change

I don't understand this enough to suggest a solution, unfortunately.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.