ASCIIDoc content required not clear for core model element descriptions
@PaulMartinsen is already working on this.
Since Dec 6, 2024.
- Dominant language
- Kotlin
- Stars
- 17
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Section Number
"Table 1:A.4.1-1. SDPi Requirement - Core Model Element Descriptions" and "Table 1:A.4.2-1. SDPi Requirement - Core Model Element Descriptions"
Priority
- Low: Typo or other minor classification that an editor can manage. Requires no group discussion.
Issue
Several terms and attributes appear in both tables with different attributes for the ASCIIDoc. For example a use case is both a core model element (sdpi_requirement_use_case) and a requirement type (sdpi_req_type=use_case_feature). It is not clear what the ASCIIDoc context should be. Other model elements affected include: sdpi_requirement_use_case, sdpi_requirement_ref_standard, sdpi_requirement_ses, sdpi_requirement_tech_feature.
Proposed Change
I don't understand this enough to suggest a solution, unfortunately.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.