HowProgrammingWorks / HowProgrammingWorks/Function
Extend test cases with passing a named function
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 42
- Forks
- 183
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
According to MDN (source):
If function name is omitted, it will be the variable name (implicit name).
If function name is present, it will be the function name (explicit name).
Code exmaple:
const foo = function () {};
foo.name // "foo"
const foo2 = foo;
foo2.name // "foo"
const bar = function baz() {};
bar.name // "baz"
I suggest extending test cases with the following case:
diff --git a/Exercises/4-methods.test b/Exercises/4-methods.test
index a408b22..78eb07d 100644
--- a/Exercises/4-methods.test
+++ b/Exercises/4-methods.test
@@ -10,11 +10,15 @@
},
m3(x, y, z) {
return [x, y, z];
- }
+ },
+ m4: function sum(x, y) {
+ return x + y;
+ },
}, [
['m1', 1],
['m2', 2],
- ['m3', 3]
+ ['m3', 3],
+ ['sum', 2],
]
],
]
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Open Exercises/4-methods.test and review the existing method cases and expected results. Extend that test with the named-function case described in the issue, and consider the work complete when the expected function name and result are covered.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100