HaxeFoundation / HaxeFoundation/haxe.org
Per-target score table
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 86
- Forks
- 96
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Maybe we should have a per-target score table somewhere. One column per target and then the rows are compilation time, run-time performance, native interop, debugging support and maybe more.
Like a feature matrix with checkmarks like (here)[https://haxe.org/foundation/support-plans.html] where 3 checkmarks = very good, no checkmarks = bad
We could take performance rates from the first graph at
So python would be in the bad group, then eval + PHP in the next one, then C# and HL and JVM and Node, then C++ and Java. Neko isn't working, it's probably in the bad group too.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reviewing the proposed feature-matrix example and the formatter-noio benchmark graph linked in the issue. Define the target columns, score criteria, and data source before locating the website page to change; done means an agreed, maintainable per-target table covering the listed metrics.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100