Graylog2 / Graylog2/graylog2-server
Netflow input - not respecting "skip" in field definitions
Open
bug
triaged
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 8.1k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 1d 20h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 217
Description
From a customer call summary:
Netflow 9 field definitions: When configured as `skip` it creates the field anyways with a generic name. Such as nf_field_235. You can drop these in a pipeline but it's another step that shouldn't be necessary if you're using custom field definitions.
We should properly handle and ignore these "Skip" fields if a user has defined them in their Netflow 9 definitions file.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.