Unreproducable: accuracy for porn class in nsfw_data_scrapper dataset
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2.1k
- Forks
- 303
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I tried to test the model against all the data from https://github.com/alexkimxyz/nsfw_data_scraper. It turns out the the model accuracy was pretty low (0.84) for porn classes. I checked several false negative images, should belong to porn. Any suggestions? Thanks
Below are detailed results for porn images:
porn 0.8378566785677277
sexy 0.09817904345614349
neutral 0.028440081768767722
hentai 0.033282149350465834
drawings 0.0022420468568952363
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reproducing the reported evaluation against the nsfw_data_scrapper dataset and compare the stated porn-class results with the false-negative images described in the issue. Done means determining whether the low accuracy is reproducible and documenting the cause or a concrete next step; no source file or test is named in the payload.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- keras, python
- Domain
- data, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100