Evaluation Methods Checkboxes
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 128
- Forks
- 36
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
We should have checkboxes for methodologies used for testing. It might be useful to list some of the more common tools and approaches used to evaluate sites and see what systems people are using.
- WebAim's WAVE Toolbar - https://wave.webaim.org/
- SSA.gov's ANDI https://www.ssa.gov/accessibility/andi/help/install.html
- Accessibility Insights - https://accessibilityinsights.io/
- FastPass
- Tab Stops
- Full assessment
- Trusted Tester - https://section508coordinators.github.io/TrustedTester/
- Siteimprove - https://siteimprove.com/
- axe
- Google Lighthouse
- Screenreader testing
- JAWS
- NVDA
- VoiceOver (OSX)
- Voiceover (iOS)
- Talkback
- Keyboard testing
- Screen magnification
- Others
Contributor guide
Research direction
The issue does not identify a file, test, or entry point. Start by locating the evaluation-methodology form or checklist in OpenACR, then compare its existing fields with the tools and approaches listed here; done means contributors can select the applicable evaluation methods, including the proposed automated and manual testing options.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- accessibility
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100