GEMScienceTools / GEMScienceTools/oq-mbtk
Consider adding ruff checks
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 22
- Forks
- 11
- Avg merge
- 20h 54m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
The formatting of the code looks a bit anarchic right now.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating the project’s formatting and lint configuration, then determine the scope of ruff checks; the work is done when the intended checks are added and the project’s code passes them.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100