Fortran-FOSS-Programmers / Fortran-FOSS-Programmers/FOODIE

Accuracy analysis of the results of tests

Open
#16 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
open discussion
Dominant language
Fortran
Stars
132
Forks
29
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Here we can discuss our conclusions about the accuracy of the results obtained from each test.
### Passed Tests

List of tests for which the results accuracy is as expected for the formal order of the numerical scheme employed:
- [ ] Lorenz' test:
- [ ] explicit:
- [ ] Adams-Bashforth;
- [ ] Euler;
- [ ] Leapfrog;
- [ ] Runge-Kutta:
- [ ] TVD/SSP;
- [ ] Low Storage;
- [x] Oscillation test1:
- [x] explicit:
- [x] Adams-Bashforth;
- [x] Adams-Bashforth-Moulton;
- [x] Euler;
- [x] Leapfrog;
- [x] Runge-Kutta:
- [x] TVD/SSP (5 stages solver seems **less acurate** than the similar low storage 5 stages);
- [x] Low Storage;
- [x] embedded3;
- [ ] Burgers' test:
- [ ] explicit:
- [ ] Adams-Bashforth;
- [ ] Euler;
- [ ] Leapfrog;
- [ ] Runge-Kutta:
- [ ] TVD/SSP;
- [ ] Low Storage;
- [x] 1D Euler test2:
- [x] explicit:
- [x] Adams-Bashforth;
- [x] Euler;
- [x] Leapfrog;
- [x] Runge-Kutta:
- [x] TVD/SSP;
- [x] Low Storage;
### Issues
1. Analysis completed: all solvers works as expected.
2. Analysis not completed.
3. It is necessary to define a methodology for measuring the accuracy of adaptive time step schemes.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.