FasterXML / FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-text

[GLD Serializer Benchmark] Java jackson-yaml unknown — spec compliance misses

Open
#733 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Java
Stars
455
Forks
164
Avg merge
6d 10h
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Description

Hi — this is a friendly report from the [GLD Serializer Benchmark](https://github.com/leo-gan/GLD.SerializerBenchmark), an independent multi-language suite that times serializers **and** checks them against the published format specs (RFC 8259, YAML 1.2, …).

We measured **jackson-yaml unknown** on **Java**. The suite recorded spec-profile misses for this pin. The catalog is **report-only**: a miss is not a CI failure, and some cases are older or stricter profiles (for example RFC 4627 vs RFC 8259) rather than a crash.

## Compliance results (please start here)

This link opens the live heatmap on **Java** with **jackson-yaml** already selected (All standards). Click a scored cell for each FAIL and the cited spec paragraph:

https://leo-gan.github.io/GLD.SerializerBenchmark/dashboard/#compliance/java/jackson-yaml

How the catalog is built, and how to read a FAIL line:

- https://leo-gan.github.io/GLD.SerializerBenchmark/compliance/
- https://leo-gan.github.io/GLD.SerializerBenchmark/compliance/reading-results/

I am not pasting the case list here so you can use the Dashboard (filters, heatmap, and spec links) rather than a static dump.

Optional: one standard family only — `#compliance/java/jackson-yaml/json` (or `yaml`, `cbor`, …).

## Benchmark timings (same pin)

The same suite also publishes encode / decode time and payload size for this library on Java:

https://leo-gan.github.io/GLD.SerializerBenchmark/dashboard/?lang=java&data=document@n=1&mode=bytes#dashboard

Details table (this library pre-selected):

https://leo-gan.github.io/GLD.SerializerBenchmark/dashboard/?lang=java&ser=jackson-yaml&data=document@n=1&mode=bytes#detailed-analytics

That page is the live L1 snapshot, not a claim that one library is “best.”

## Ask

Please look at the Compliance view for **jackson-yaml**. If a miss is a real decoder/encoder bug you want to fix, great. If it is an intentional default (accepting NaN, YAML 1.1 bools, …), a short note here is enough — we will keep the catalog as-is unless the library’s documented contract changes.

Thanks for the library.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.