EricssonResearch / EricssonResearch/Blind-Cache-Drafts
Redundant potential benefits
- Dominant language
- Makefile
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 2
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
SCD says:
> Lower time to last byte: For some resources, the proximity of the
> CDN might also permit greater network throughput. Increased
> bandwidth can counteract the added latency cost of the extra
> requests, and potentially reduce the time needed to retrieve the
> entire resource.
>
> Better throughput: If a CDN is closer to a client, more bandwidth
> might be available for delivery of content when compared with the
> link between client and origin server.
I don't see a difference between "greater network throughput / increased bandwidth" and "better throughput / more bandwidth." If these are supposed to be different, please clarify; otherwise, please merge.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with the SCD section quoted in the issue and compare the descriptions of the two potential benefits. Done means either clarifying the distinction between them or merging the redundant text, with the resulting wording reflected in the document.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100