EnAccess / EnAccess/micropowermanager

[Feature Request]: Consolidate `Village` and `City` terminilogy

Open
#1,310 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Code base improvement enhancement good first issue help wanted
Dominant language
PHP
Stars
27
Forks
19
Avg merge
1d 18h
Merged PRs (30d)
27

Description

### Preflight Checklist

- [x] I have read the [Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/EnAccess/micropowermanager/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) for this project, if it exists.
- [x] I agree to follow the [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/EnAccess/micropowermanager/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) that this project adheres to.
- [x] I have searched the [issue tracker](https://github.com/EnAccess/micropowermanager/issues) for a feature request that matches the one I want to file, without success.

### Problem Description

Currently, `Village` and `City` are used interchangeably. This leads to confusion amongst users.

For example:

- When creating a customer users have to provide a `City`
- On an initial instance of MPM no cities are available
- Users have to use the `Create Village` button to add a `City`

Which is unintuitive.

### Proposed Solution

Please consolidate all users of `city` and `village` to **only use `Village`**.

This covers

- Function calls
- `cities` tables
- UI elements

### Alternatives Considered

N/A

### Additional Information

_No response_

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.