EnAccess / EnAccess/micropowermanager
[Feature Request]: Consolidate `Village` and `City` terminilogy
- Dominant language
- PHP
- Stars
- 27
- Forks
- 19
- Avg merge
- 1d 18h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 27
Description
### Preflight Checklist
- [x] I have read the [Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/EnAccess/micropowermanager/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) for this project, if it exists.
- [x] I agree to follow the [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/EnAccess/micropowermanager/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) that this project adheres to.
- [x] I have searched the [issue tracker](https://github.com/EnAccess/micropowermanager/issues) for a feature request that matches the one I want to file, without success.
### Problem Description
Currently, `Village` and `City` are used interchangeably. This leads to confusion amongst users.
For example:
- When creating a customer users have to provide a `City`
- On an initial instance of MPM no cities are available
- Users have to use the `Create Village` button to add a `City`
Which is unintuitive.
### Proposed Solution
Please consolidate all users of `city` and `village` to **only use `Village`**.
This covers
- Function calls
- `cities` tables
- UI elements
### Alternatives Considered
N/A
### Additional Information
_No response_
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.