[Javadoc] Consider using Dokka HTML docs instead for Javadoc artifact

### Is there an existing issue for this?

- [X] I have searched the existing issues

### Library name

All

### Library version

All

### What happened?

It appears that [Dokka's HTML format](https://kotlinlang.org/docs/dokka-html.html) renders just fine if used as a "Javadoc" source - not sure if this is used internally for IntelliJ's quick documentation, but trying to [open a Javadoc of for example the kotlin-logging library](https://javadoc.io/doc/io.github.oshai/kotlin-logging-jvm/latest/kotlin-logging/io.github.oshai.kotlinlogging/index.html) seems to work just fine.

### Expected behaviour

_No response_

### Reproduction steps

1. [Open the javadoc jar file for say, `common-enums-jvm`](https://javadoc.io/doc/io.github.edricchan03.androidx.common/common-enums-jvm/latest/index.html)
2. Note that the [Javadoc-style format](https://kotlinlang.org/docs/dokka-javadoc.html) is used, instead of [Dokka's HTML format](https://kotlinlang.org/docs/dokka-html.html)

### Relevant log output

_No response_

### Possible solution

Switch to publishing 100% Dokka HTML docs, not sure if there'll be any unforeseen issues though

### Additional context

While browsing the Javadocs for kotlin-logging, I noticed that they're using Dokka HTML docs and that it shows up just fine on https://javadoc.io