Design signed team policy distribution
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 26
- Forks
- 6
- Avg merge
- 1h 13m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 384
Description
## Problem
Teams may need centrally managed protection requirements, but the policy model and user experience need a clear design before implementation.
## Questions
- How are destination rules, required plugins, trusted publishers, file limits, and compatibility exceptions represented?
- Which rules may a project strengthen, and which may it weaken?
- How are policy bundles signed, distributed, cached, updated, and rolled back?
- How does Pentect explain the effective policy without exposing sensitive configuration?
- What is the smallest useful team feature that does not introduce enterprise-only complexity?
## Status
Design exploration only; implementation remains deferred until these questions are resolved.
Contributor guide
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are identified. Start by resolving the listed policy-model, precedence, signing, distribution, caching, rollback, and user-experience questions. Done means a focused design defines the smallest useful team feature and settles implementation scope.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- security
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100