ESCOMP / ESCOMP/ESMStandardNames

Usage of "sea" vs "ocean" in names

Open
#156 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Python
Stars
9
Forks
17
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Currently there is a mix of variable names using "ocean" and "sea", without a clear concept of what, if anything, is the difference between the two. Or if one word was chosen over the other for any reason other than etymology. "Sea" seems to be the more prevalent of the two.

We know not every sea is an ocean, but is every ocean a sea? If so, is standardizing on "sea" preferable, being the more general word?

For the name `skin_temperature_at_surface_over_ocean`, the people in my sphere would prefer to use "sea" instead of "ocean". Why was "ocean" chosen here?

Is there ever a use case for using "water", if the lake/sea/ocean distinction is unimportant? Currently there is both `lake_depth` and `sea_water_depth`. (And the description of `sea_water_depth` is "The depth of the ocean floor below the surface of the sea," which highlights the interchangeability of the two words.)

If we want to continue to use a mix of the two words, it would be nice to have a clearer description of why and when each should be used.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.