ESCOMP / ESCOMP/CTSM

Harmonizing control of harvest modes for FATES and non-fates

Open
#2,646 0 comments 0 reactions 1 assignee Claimed by @glemieux View on GitHub
enhancement priority: low
Dominant language
Fortran
Stars
352
Forks
361
Avg merge
6d 6h
Merged PRs (30d)
8

Description

> For the `fates_harvest_mode` update it was decided that we should segregate fates from `do_harvest` to avoid increasing complexity for this update since the `landuse_timeseries` option for fates harvest will be deprecated at a future date. As such I wanted to avoid allowing `do_harvest` with fates entirely.

_Originally posted by @glemieux in https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/pull/2507#discussion_r1676188434_

Per discussion with @ekluzek, we should have a wider conversation about how we might want to harmonizing using harvest modes for CN and FATES to provide the user with the ability to set harvest with one option regardless of land model. We likely will want to address this once fates sunsets use of the `fates_harvest_mode='landuse_timeseries'` optin.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.