E3SM-Project / E3SM-Project/containers

settle on a broader naming convention for supported containers

Open
#45 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Dockerfile
Stars
4
Forks
4
Avg merge
14h 7m
Merged PRs (30d)
9

Description

the ghci stuff may feel a bit dated now... and the SNL containers are pretty general (they can run anywhere!)

cc @bartgol

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Review the repository's existing container recipes and naming, paying particular attention to the ghci and SNL containers mentioned in the issue. Compare their current names and intended scope, then use the issue discussion to establish whether a broader convention has been agreed. Done means the convention and affected names are clearly settled.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
dockerfile
Domain
devops
Issue type
Refactor
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.