Dstack-TEE / Dstack-TEE/dstack-examples

object capability demonstration using secure VATs

Open
#29 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
app-idea devtool-idea
Dominant language
Python
Stars
27
Forks
26
Avg merge
1h 25m
Merged PRs (30d)
7

Description

There's a great body of work on object capability languages as a way of managing the risk of running untrusted code modules by only exposing limited fine-grained capabilities to the untrusted code.

http://www.erights.org/

But, while the subject is untrusted code, the environment itself in which the code runs, called a "Vat", must be considered trusted.

![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa9514f1-556e-4f6c-bd25-4c9b00cf85a0)

This is problematic when using cross-vat distributed code, because one malicious vat can steal the "Swiss number" references (random unguessable strings, effectively symmetric keys).

This makes it hard to reconcile object capability languages with smart contracts. In smart contracts we go out of our way to run consensus protocols so that a trusted environment can be built on untrusted nodes, but we can't assume privacy and so we can't use Swiss number references.

So now, by instantiating the vat with Dstack, we might be able to close this gap and draw some more insights or better composition / better hardening as a result.

As a starting point, we might simply run existing ocap sandbox in Dstack, possibly adding a new shim for referencing objects in different Dstack instances as different vats
https://github.com/endojs/endo

A more thoughtful example probably needs to illustrate some pattern of passing serialized/hardened code, containing Swiss numbers or even private keys, between such sandboxes. Needs more thought though

chatgpt discussion:
https://chatgpt.com/share/67ff0b25-b580-8009-a13b-d5ca70cb5fb7

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.