DomTheDeveloper / DomTheDeveloper/crl

Audit panel A: Bernstein approximation and prior-art collision

Open
#98 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

help wanted
Dominant language
Lean
Stars
0
Forks
1
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Objective

Independently determine whether the final V4 Bernstein-cone contribution is new and correctly distinguished from prior work.

Frozen V4 target

  • branch: review/bernstein-obstacle-v4-final
  • commit: 61594952ad880d2b61759cfa93a19df979183c09
  • analytical integration PR: #114
  • parent audit: #96

Earlier v1/v2/v3 targets remain available only for provenance.

Claims to test

  1. Nonnegative Bernstein coefficients are a known sufficient global range certificate and are not claimed as new.
  2. Bounds-constrained high-order FEM and obstacle methods are known and are not claimed as new.
  3. The candidate novelty is the combination of:
    • a conforming Bernstein coefficient obstacle cone;
    • Mosco recovery for that cone;
    • threshold-form constructive scheduling of smooth/FEM recovery stages;
    • conformity-preserving global coefficient clipping near a regular free boundary;
    • the corrected conditional h^r + h_Gamma^(3/2) energy estimate under explicit local grading, regularity, multiplier, and boundary hypotheses;
    • certified adaptive/contact computation;
    • a pinned Lean finite/abstract bridge with an explicit analytical trust boundary.

Required comparison set

  • Allen–Kirby bounds-constrained Bernstein approximation;
  • Kirby–Shapero high-order bounds-satisfying FEM;
  • higher-order primal and mixed obstacle FEM;
  • proximal Galerkin and other structure-preserving pointwise-constraint methods;
  • hp/spectral obstacle methods with GLL constraints;
  • certified polynomial range-bound methods;
  • formal Bernstein/de Casteljau work in proof assistants;
  • any earlier Bernstein–Bézier obstacle/contact discretization or Mosco analysis.

Deliverable

A source-cited report stating exact collisions, exact claims that remain new, missing references or terminology, whether the novelty language is acceptable, and the search strategy/databases used. A negative result or prior-art collision is fully eligible.

Internal scope label

FUN BUX: 3,500. This is an unfunded internal effort/complexity label, not a real or promised bounty. No payment is represented as available unless separate written funding terms are posted.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Inspect the frozen V4 target at commit 61594952ad880d2b61759cfa93a19df979183c09, along with analytical integration PR #114 and parent audit #96. Compare the required prior-art categories, then produce a source-cited report identifying exact collisions, remaining novelty claims, missing references or terminology, and the search strategy and databases used.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.