DomTheDeveloper / DomTheDeveloper/crl
Audit panel A: Bernstein approximation and prior-art collision
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Lean
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Objective
Independently determine whether the final V4 Bernstein-cone contribution is new and correctly distinguished from prior work.
Frozen V4 target
- branch:
review/bernstein-obstacle-v4-final - commit:
61594952ad880d2b61759cfa93a19df979183c09 - analytical integration PR: #114
- parent audit: #96
Earlier v1/v2/v3 targets remain available only for provenance.
Claims to test
- Nonnegative Bernstein coefficients are a known sufficient global range certificate and are not claimed as new.
- Bounds-constrained high-order FEM and obstacle methods are known and are not claimed as new.
- The candidate novelty is the combination of:
- a conforming Bernstein coefficient obstacle cone;
- Mosco recovery for that cone;
- threshold-form constructive scheduling of smooth/FEM recovery stages;
- conformity-preserving global coefficient clipping near a regular free boundary;
- the corrected conditional
h^r + h_Gamma^(3/2)energy estimate under explicit local grading, regularity, multiplier, and boundary hypotheses; - certified adaptive/contact computation;
- a pinned Lean finite/abstract bridge with an explicit analytical trust boundary.
Required comparison set
- Allen–Kirby bounds-constrained Bernstein approximation;
- Kirby–Shapero high-order bounds-satisfying FEM;
- higher-order primal and mixed obstacle FEM;
- proximal Galerkin and other structure-preserving pointwise-constraint methods;
- hp/spectral obstacle methods with GLL constraints;
- certified polynomial range-bound methods;
- formal Bernstein/de Casteljau work in proof assistants;
- any earlier Bernstein–Bézier obstacle/contact discretization or Mosco analysis.
Deliverable
A source-cited report stating exact collisions, exact claims that remain new, missing references or terminology, whether the novelty language is acceptable, and the search strategy/databases used. A negative result or prior-art collision is fully eligible.
Internal scope label
FUN BUX: 3,500. This is an unfunded internal effort/complexity label, not a real or promised bounty. No payment is represented as available unless separate written funding terms are posted.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Inspect the frozen V4 target at commit 61594952ad880d2b61759cfa93a19df979183c09, along with analytical integration PR #114 and parent audit #96. Compare the required prior-art categories, then produce a source-cited report identifying exact collisions, remaining novelty claims, missing references or terminology, and the search strategy and databases used.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100