DomTheDeveloper / DomTheDeveloper/crl

Independent audit requested: Bernstein obstacle Mosco and free-boundary theorem

Open
#96 5 comments 0 reactions 1 assignee View on GitHub

@DomTheDeveloper is already working on this.

Since Jul 20, 2026.

Dominant language
Lean
Stars
0
Forks
1
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Corrected audit target

Please independently review the corrected Bernstein–Bézier obstacle theorem package at:

  • immutable branch: review/bernstein-obstacle-v2-corrected
  • commit: f2bd41f19ff5afbcca8a23f9afdcdf084364dae4
  • correction PR: #106

The original PR #95 / v1 commit remains frozen for provenance, but new analytical reviews must use the corrected v2 target.

The complete adversarial checklist is in:

math/bernstein_obstacle/INDEPENDENT_AUDIT_REQUEST.md

The two principal claims are:

  1. Mosco convergence of the coefficient-feasible Bernstein finite-element cones to H_0^1(Omega) ∩ {v >= 0}, with strong convergence of symmetric coercive obstacle minimizers.
  2. Under the corrected explicit local grading, broken regularity, multiplier, and boundary hypotheses,
    ||u-u_h^B||_{H1} <= C (h^r + h_Gamma^(3/2)).

Material corrections reviewers must inspect

  • R_h = {T : dist(T,Gamma) <= kappa h_T} uses local element size;
  • the fixed one-ring patch is locally quasi-uniform and satisfies |omega_h| <= C h_Gamma;
  • the bulk estimate assumes a uniform broken H^{r+1} bound outside the patch;
  • physical-boundary coefficients are split into exact zero face coefficients and off-face coefficients controlled by inward linear growth;
  • the phase-sensitive selected-mesh Hertz factor is no longer presented as a general claim.

Required reviewer output

  • exact theorem and hypotheses accepted or rejected;
  • pass/fail on each audit item;
  • explicit references or derivations for every imported theorem;
  • files and scripts executed;
  • any counterexample, missing assumption, or corrected statement;
  • separate assessment of mathematical validity and novelty.

Proposed bounty

  • $7,500 for a complete written mathematical audit;
  • $15,000 for the audit plus independent code reproduction and either a signed theorem endorsement or a concrete counterexample/fix for every failed item.

These are proposed project bounties, not standardized market-rate claims.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.