DomTheDeveloper / DomTheDeveloper/crl
Audit panel E: nonlinear Bernstein grand theorem and codimension law
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Lean
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Objective
Independently audit the proposed Bernstein certified-inner-approximation grand theorem on branch agent/bernstein-grand-theorem.
The theorem extends the corrected obstacle package from symmetric quadratic energies to Lipschitz strongly monotone, possibly nonlinear and nonsymmetric, variational inequalities. It also proposes a unified geometric law for scalar interior obstacles and planar frictionless Signorini contact.
Exact claims to test
E1. Nonlinear certified Falk estimate
For K_h ⊂ K and strongly monotone Lipschitz F, verify
||u-u_h||_V^2
≤ (L^2/alpha^2) ||u-v_h||_V^2
+ (2/alpha) <F(u), v_h-u>
for every v_h ∈ K_h, without symmetry or a potential.
E2. Perturbed-operator estimate
Audit equation (5.3), including all signs and dependence on the a posteriori consistency defect.
E3. Codimension repair law
For a constraint manifold of ambient codimension c, audit
||d_h||_V = O(h_Sigma^((c+3)/2))
under the stated stable-lifting and patch-count assumptions.
E4. Universal multiplier law
Audit the claim that quadratic gap amplitude and an O(h_Sigma) active transition strip give
<F(u), v_h-u> = O(h_Sigma^3)
for both volume obstacles and boundary contact, yielding a common final h_Sigma^(3/2) term.
E5. Planar Signorini lifting
Audit the global normal-control update
U_i_tilde = U_i + min(c_i,0) n,
c_i = g_i - U_i·n,
including conformity, essential-boundary compatibility, support, and physical H^1 scaling.
E6. Conservative inexact data
Check the one-sided directions:
psi_h^+ >= psiforv >= psi;g_h^- <= gforg-v·n >= 0.
Audit the additive consistency terms in equation (14.1).
E7. Prior-art collision
Search nonlinear VI approximation, high-order bounds-constrained FEM, Bernstein/Bézier contact, hp/mortar/BEM contact, Mosco stability, and active-transition error analysis. Identify which exact combined claims, if any, remain new.
Required verdict
Return PASS, PASS AFTER STATED CORRECTION, or FAIL for E1–E7. A counterexample, prior-art collision, or narrower corrected theorem counts as a successful audit outcome.
The report must satisfy math/bernstein_obstacle/EXTERNAL_REVIEW_PROTOCOL.md and must not treat internal AI work or repository-owner review as independent endorsement.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with math/bernstein_obstacle/EXTERNAL_REVIEW_PROTOCOL.md and inspect branch agent/bernstein-grand-theorem alongside the stated E1–E7 claims. Done means an independent report following the protocol, giving PASS, PASS AFTER STATED CORRECTION, or FAIL for each claim and recording counterexamples, corrections, or prior-art collisions without treating internal review as endorsement.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100