DomTheDeveloper / DomTheDeveloper/crl
Audit the Bernstein grand order-interval and Banach-scale clipping theorems
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Lean
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Audit target
Please independently audit the new analytical extension on:
- branch:
research/bernstein-grand-order-interval - commit:
b6fa26c1d45d5ad0c633cd6fb9455b126a4782c1 - theorem note:
math/bernstein_obstacle/GRAND_ORDER_INTERVAL_THEOREM.md
This is a research target, not a replacement for the immutable corrected v2 theorem.
Principal claims
Theorem A — bilateral order-interval Mosco convergence
For fixed-degree conforming simplicial Bernstein finite elements in W_0^{1,p}, conservative sampled obstacle envelopes
psi_h^+ = B_h psi + E_psi h^2,
phi_h^- = B_h phi - E_phi h^2
and coefficient inequalities produce an exactly feasible discrete set K_h^B subset K_{psi,phi} that Mosco-converges to the continuous bilateral obstacle interval.
Theorem B — nonlinear uniformly convex transfer
Minimizers of coercive uniformly convex p-growth energies over K_h^B converge strongly in W_0^{1,p}. This includes weighted p-Dirichlet energies.
Theorem C — codimension–growth clipping law
If coefficient corrections have amplitude O(h^beta) on a patch of measure O(h^kappa), then
||d_h||_{W^{1,q}} <= C h^(beta - 1 + kappa/q).
Quadratic contact on a codimension-one patch gives h^(1+1/q), whose q=2 case is the corrected h^(3/2) theorem.
Required mathematical checks
- Uniform
L^infinityBernstein sampling error for fixed degree on shape-regular simplices. - Global conformity from shared physical barycentric lattice values.
- Conservative envelope signs and exact pointwise inclusion
K_h^B subset K. - Existence of a strict collar-supported feasible function.
- Strong
W^{1,p}density of strictW^{2,infinity}feasible functions using interiorization, variable-interval projection, zero extension and mollification. - Diagonal Mosco recovery with the obstacle-envelope
h^2shifts. - Weak closedness of the bilateral order interval.
- Uniform-convexity argument upgrading weak/energy convergence to strong convergence.
- Applicability to weighted p-Dirichlet energies for every
1<p<infinity. - Reference-element norm equivalence and patch summation in Theorem C.
Required collision search
Compare against:
- Kirby–Shapero high-order bounds-satisfying variational inequalities;
- Allen–Kirby bounds-constrained Bernstein approximation;
- higher-order p-Laplacian obstacle FEM;
- the 2026 hp/SEM obstacle theorem using transformed GLL constraints and Bernstein positivity;
- Mosco convergence for moving unilateral and bilateral obstacle sets;
- bounds-preserving Bernstein/Bezier FEM and limiter literature.
The report must distinguish novelty of individual ingredients from novelty of their combination.
Nonlinear-rate boundary
The note does not claim a completed sharp p-Laplacian free-boundary rate. The predicted exponent requires a separate operator-specific Bregman/Falk estimate and a verified contact-growth law. Treat any unconditional nonlinear sharp-rate statement as an error.
Deliverable
A numbered PASS, PASS AFTER CORRECTION, or FAIL report with precise derivations, counterexamples, references, and the strongest valid theorem after any corrections.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read math/bernstein_obstacle/GRAND_ORDER_INTERVAL_THEOREM.md at commit b6fa26c1d45d5ad0c633cd6fb9455b126a4782c1 on research/bernstein-grand-order-interval, then work through the ten mathematical checks and the collision-search references. Done means a numbered PASS, PASS AFTER CORRECTION, or FAIL report with derivations, counterexamples, references, and the strongest valid corrected theorem.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100