DomTheDeveloper / DomTheDeveloper/crl
External reviewers wanted: signed Bernstein obstacle audit reports
@DomTheDeveloper is already working on this.
Since Jul 20, 2026.
- Dominant language
- Lean
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Purpose
Recruit genuinely independent reviewers for the final Bernstein–Bézier obstacle theorem package using math/bernstein_obstacle/EXTERNAL_REVIEW_PROTOCOL.md. No email campaign is being used.
Final frozen review target
- immutable branch:
review/bernstein-obstacle-v4-final - commit:
61594952ad880d2b61759cfa93a19df979183c09 - analytical integration PR: #114
Reviewers beginning now must audit V4, not the moving research branch or superseded v1/v2/v3 statements.
Material V4 improvements
- Corrected local-size risky set and one-ring geometry.
- Uniform broken
H^{r+1}assumption. - Shared-DOF support enlargement from
R_htoomega_h. - Multi-face physical-boundary proof covering corner elements.
- Tubular, compact-interior, and physical-boundary positivity split.
- Explicit multiplier sign convention and exact energy identity.
- Constructive scheduled-stage Lean theorem from mesh thresholds.
ThresholdSobolevFEMRecoveryDataconnecting local analytical estimates to the verified Mosco/minimizer endgame.- Corrected Hertz phase-sensitivity data and project-internal replication wording.
Candidate PR #117 ports the coordinate-free Hilbert VI and nested recovery-to-strong-convergence theorem onto V4. Reviewers should treat it as a candidate addition until its pinned audit is green.
Review panels
- #98 — prior-art collision — FUN BUX: 3,500
- #99 — Mosco/FEM recovery — FUN BUX: 4,500
- #100 — free-boundary clipping and
h_Gamma^(3/2)— FUN BUX: 4,500 - #101 — Lean statement faithfulness — FUN BUX: 2,500
These are unfunded internal effort/complexity labels. They are not real or promised bounties. No payment is represented as available unless separate written funding terms are posted.
How to volunteer
Post your panel, expertise/profile, conflicts, and confirmation that you will review commit 61594952ad880d2b61759cfa93a19df979183c09.
A final report must state PASS, PASS AFTER CORRECTION, or FAIL, answer every panel item, and post the report artifact SHA-256. Counterexamples and corrected narrower theorems are fully eligible.
Independence boundary
Repository-owner reviews, automated-agent outputs, and project-internal implementations do not count as independent endorsement. The theorem will not be advertised as externally confirmed until qualified reviewers post public signed reports.
Issue #103 separately requests outside computational reproduction; the scikit-fem implementation in the repository is project-internal, not clean-room independent validation.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.