DomTheDeveloper / DomTheDeveloper/crl

Audit panel C: regular free-boundary clipping and 3/2 energy rate

Open
#100 7 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

help wanted
Dominant language
Lean
Stars
0
Forks
1
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Objective

Independently audit the corrected scoped sharp theorem:

||u-u_h^B||_{H1} <= C (h^r + h_Gamma^(3/2)).

Frozen V4 target

  • branch: review/bernstein-obstacle-v4-final
  • commit: 61594952ad880d2b61759cfa93a19df979183c09
  • analytical integration PR: #114
  • parent audit: #96

Earlier targets remain available only for provenance.

Required checks

  1. Exact regular-free-boundary assumptions and whether they are standard or natural.
  2. u in C^{1,1}, u = grad u = 0 on Gamma, and two-sided quadratic gap growth in the stated fixed tubular neighborhood.
  3. Uniform one-sided H^{r+1} extension near the positive phase.
  4. Uniform broken regularity bound sum_{T notin omega_h} |u|_{H^{r+1}(T)}^2 <= C_reg.
  5. Coefficient-to-grid-value estimate and all-degree barycentric interpolation unisolvence.
  6. Correct local-size risky set R_h = {T : dist(T,Gamma) <= kappa h_T}.
  7. Phase classification of non-risky elements into contact interior, tubular positive phase, compact positive interior, and physical-boundary cases.
  8. Local quasi-uniformity on the fixed one-ring patch and |omega_h| <= C_Gamma h_Gamma.
  9. Explicit enlargement of clipping support from R_h to the shared-DOF one-ring omega_h.
  10. Two-sided O(h_Gamma^2) coefficient amplitude on every element in that one-ring.
  11. Conformity and boundary-data preservation under shared global coefficient clipping.
  12. Multi-face physical-boundary proof, including corner elements.
  13. Finite-dimensional scaling giving O(h_Gamma^(3/2)) in H1.
  14. Multiplier convention, support, bounded-density assumption, and the O(h_Gamma^3) consistency term.
  15. Both the exact energy-identity proof and the Falk proof.
  16. Dimensions two and three; singular/degenerate interfaces, anisotropic meshes, boundary-touching free boundaries, and measure-valued multipliers remain excluded.
  17. Whether any grading or regularity assumption can be weakened without invalidating the exponent.

Deliverable

A line-by-line PASS, PASS AFTER CORRECTION, or FAIL verdict, including any missing hypothesis, counterexample, corrected exponent, or narrower valid theorem. A rejection or correction is fully eligible.

Internal scope label

FUN BUX: 4,500. This is an unfunded internal effort/complexity label, not a real or promised bounty. No payment is represented as available unless separate written funding terms are posted.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with branch review/bernstein-obstacle-v4-final at commit 61594952ad880d2b61759cfa93a19df979183c09, then compare the analytical integration in PR #114 with parent audit #96. Check each of the 17 required points and record PASS, PASS AFTER CORRECTION, or FAIL, including missing hypotheses, counterexamples, or a corrected exponent. The deliverable is a line-by-line verdict for dimensions two and three.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
git
Domain
testing
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.