DomTheDeveloper / DomTheDeveloper/crl
Audit panel C: regular free-boundary clipping and 3/2 energy rate
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Lean
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Objective
Independently audit the corrected scoped sharp theorem:
||u-u_h^B||_{H1} <= C (h^r + h_Gamma^(3/2)).
Frozen V4 target
- branch:
review/bernstein-obstacle-v4-final - commit:
61594952ad880d2b61759cfa93a19df979183c09 - analytical integration PR: #114
- parent audit: #96
Earlier targets remain available only for provenance.
Required checks
- Exact regular-free-boundary assumptions and whether they are standard or natural.
u in C^{1,1},u = grad u = 0onGamma, and two-sided quadratic gap growth in the stated fixed tubular neighborhood.- Uniform one-sided
H^{r+1}extension near the positive phase. - Uniform broken regularity bound
sum_{T notin omega_h} |u|_{H^{r+1}(T)}^2 <= C_reg. - Coefficient-to-grid-value estimate and all-degree barycentric interpolation unisolvence.
- Correct local-size risky set
R_h = {T : dist(T,Gamma) <= kappa h_T}. - Phase classification of non-risky elements into contact interior, tubular positive phase, compact positive interior, and physical-boundary cases.
- Local quasi-uniformity on the fixed one-ring patch and
|omega_h| <= C_Gamma h_Gamma. - Explicit enlargement of clipping support from
R_hto the shared-DOF one-ringomega_h. - Two-sided
O(h_Gamma^2)coefficient amplitude on every element in that one-ring. - Conformity and boundary-data preservation under shared global coefficient clipping.
- Multi-face physical-boundary proof, including corner elements.
- Finite-dimensional scaling giving
O(h_Gamma^(3/2))inH1. - Multiplier convention, support, bounded-density assumption, and the
O(h_Gamma^3)consistency term. - Both the exact energy-identity proof and the Falk proof.
- Dimensions two and three; singular/degenerate interfaces, anisotropic meshes, boundary-touching free boundaries, and measure-valued multipliers remain excluded.
- Whether any grading or regularity assumption can be weakened without invalidating the exponent.
Deliverable
A line-by-line PASS, PASS AFTER CORRECTION, or FAIL verdict, including any missing hypothesis, counterexample, corrected exponent, or narrower valid theorem. A rejection or correction is fully eligible.
Internal scope label
FUN BUX: 4,500. This is an unfunded internal effort/complexity label, not a real or promised bounty. No payment is represented as available unless separate written funding terms are posted.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with branch review/bernstein-obstacle-v4-final at commit 61594952ad880d2b61759cfa93a19df979183c09, then compare the analytical integration in PR #114 with parent audit #96. Check each of the 17 required points and record PASS, PASS AFTER CORRECTION, or FAIL, including missing hypotheses, counterexamples, or a corrected exponent. The deliverable is a line-by-line verdict for dimensions two and three.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- git
- Domain
- testing
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100